by windward » Mon Oct 06, 2008 11:07 pm
Thank you, Gentletouch, for your kind words, especially coming from such a scholar as yourself.
To all my friends on this board,
I have wrestled with this subject myself. I have a beloved Jewish friend, a brilliant, brilliant man, who tells me he can't accept Christ because he thinks that in order for God to come down to earth as man, He had to change his nature, and it is heresy in the Jewish tradition to believe that God changes His nature.
I have a dear SIL who is married to a Muslim man and can't bear to think of her husband and her late MIL - a very loving and devout woman - as "going to hell."
This is a difficult subject for believers to wrestle with, forget non-believers.
And the argument we hear the most is "Why would a loving God send a good person to Hell."
I'm not the scholar that some on this board are, but I know this.
God is just not good, He's holy. As in perfect. As in sinless, As in him there is no shadow of anything dark or evil or bad. He is pure - as in pure love, pure light, pure mercy - everything He is is unalduterated good.
And He does not tolerate sin, even in His own creatures. Lucifer, the lead worshipper, the most beautiful of all the angels, was cast out because of the sin of pride. The problem with sin is it's polluting, like cigarette smoke when you're enjoying a fine meal outdoors. It dirties and contaminates what it touches - think of dirty snow, or a dirty footprint on a pure white piece of paper. Sin renders good things unable to fulfill the function they were created for. So, God can't tolerate sin and can't allow it in His presence or in Heaven because, to be blunt, He doesn't want the pollution. Heaven isn't heaven with just a little bad thrown in.
And then here we are saying, "But we're good!" But good isn't perfect. Good isn't pure. Good isn't holy. "Good" is good enough for down here. And good is man's term. We're deciding what's good. It's not God's definition. We're saying, hey, God, we think you're being a little unreasonable here. But who else do we do that do? I mean, if you go to a friend's house and they don't allow smoking in their home, do you say, Oh, come on, man. You call yourself a good friend. If you're such a good friend, why can't I smoke in your house? The answer would be, "If
you are my friend, you'll accept my rules for my house. You're welcome to be here, but I can't abide smoke." Right? So why do we not allow God the same license we allow ourselves?
So God is in a situation where He loves us and wants to be able to have us near him, but he can't - because of the "smoke" of our sins.
Big problem. But not for God. He says, Okay. I'll fix that. I'll arrange it so that the punishment you would ordinarily receive for your sins will be paid by Somebody else, and you'll get the credit for it. You just have to believe it and receive it in the person of My Son. And then you can be with Me forever. How does that sound?"
lAnd then being the sorry bunch we are, instead of saying, "Wonderful!" we say, "Ah, man, what kind of God are you? How come we have to do it your way and not our way?" Can anybody else see the ludicrousness of this argument? You wouldn't try that argument with a friend, but yet we'll try it with God.
This is a hard concept in a day and age where I'm okay, you're okay, and everybody does their own thing and truth is relative and who are you to judge, man. I've struggled with it, and I finally came to the conclusion that the best way to deal with it is to pray. I just pray for the person to come to know the Lord, no matter what their persuasion. And we know it happens. We know good Jews convert, Muslims convert, atheists believe, and everyday "good" people come to a point of repentance and ask Jesus into their hearts. Just keep on praying. Love, Win.